| | Let's consider the benefits and drawbacks of rental and built-in webhard.
Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This refers to something that shares idc's server resources with other users.
Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.
웹하드 사이트 has the advantage of having a server on idc, so it does not have to be managed separately, and the initial setting cost is low.
However, you must pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, purchase capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.
There are disadvantages such as dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) and other domains.
Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to build services, freeing up capacity and traffic.
It gets the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies usually do not use rental solutions. Webhard isn't just a Webhard, it is a company.
It is because it really is confidential and knows the energy of strategic sharing and well-managed data.
Link hard solutions have emerged in line with the intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without any burden.
It does not need to purchase H/W separately, and the perfect solution is alone allows users to create Webhard by utilizing the desired pc, NAS, and server equipment.
If you already had an internet site or intranet, you can stop unnecessary work that used to run the site.
OK to create installed blogs or bulletin boards.
By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the company's homepage and also the Webhard's original function, the thought of developing a use-oriented product makes one look forward to the expansion of the perfect solution is.
The price is also from 300,000 won for 30 people, which may be fully built in Soho, therefore the parts that have been agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will be solved a lot.
It is now necessary for Soho to determine a web hard system.
Rental vs. Construction.
Webhard reminds you of a very useful and convenient Internet service that allows one to download files on the internet at a set monthly cost. This means that the utilization of web hard has become common.
But it's not just lately that this concept came out, and it's true that it's been a long time. The moment it came out, lots of people used it, and there have been many office workers who didn't join it or even covered their personal expenses due to lack of capacity, and there are probably still some now.
The biggest background of this phenomenon may be the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as for example work used, while there are many burdens and inconveniences to pay monthly expenses predicated on limited capacity. In addition, the service is provided contrary to the backdrop of a big portal, which also results in security concerns concerning the leakage of confidential information, which explains why the company won't adopt it.
In some cases, there are also many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet the needs of users' needs. The deployment of a standalone server consists of a server (HW)+ operating system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses in line with the number of users), which is prohibitive compared to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included.
NAS supplies a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anybody with significantly decrease the needs of these webhard users. Webhard is very innovative since it supports uploading files by default. It's a really good feature because DDNS, etc. could be accessed from the outside without needing to buy an authorized IP.
Unfortunately, there are functional limitations as the basic webhard contained in these NAS is basic. Because the word "basic" implies, it's not a webhard solution developed at a higher cost. Because of this, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Of course, it is a paid option, but it's a very low-cost, very useful solution that's less than a tenth of the expense of building a single server.
Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low cost, creating a small but powerful collaborative file server. I'll check out the rough features of Webhard and guide you. It is possible to go over it and choose the best one in line with the reality and needs. | | | |
|